Schumacher pointed out that from the perspective of the employer, work is a bad thing. It represents a cost. It is to be minimised. If possible eradicated – handed over to a robot. This truth always makes me smile when the government talks of the private sector ‘creating jobs’.
From the perspective of the worker too it is often a bad thing. What Schumacher called a ‘disutility‘. A temporary but significant sacrifice of ‘leisure and comfort’ for which compensation is earned.
Schumacher pointed toward a Buddhist perspective where work serves three purposes:
- to provide an opportunity to use and develop potential
- to join with others in the achievement of a shared task – to provide opportunities for meaningful association
- to produce the goods and services that are necessary for what he called a ‘becoming existence’
He then went on to say
to organize work in such a manner that it becomes meaningless, boring, stultifying, or nerve-racking for the worker would be little short of criminal; it would indicate a greater concern with goods than with people, an evil lack of compassion and a soul-destroying degree of attachment to the most primitive side of this worldly existence
What can we do to make sure that more of our work is ‘good work’ and not merely a disutility for which we are compensated?
What products and services do we really need for a ‘becoming existence’.
This for me is the true role of the ‘Social Enterprise’ sector in our economy. The development of good work. The enhancement of association and compassion. To provide a real alternative to the mainstream ‘work as profitable disutility’ philosophy of much (but not all) of the private sector.
And there is no good reason why we should not take sufficient value from our business to lead a ‘becoming existence’ is there?
I’m trying to learn just to die with pride,
Like the birds and the trees and the earth in time
But I’ve got this complex and it makes me fear,
That I’ll die knowing nothing and feeling less.
Now, anyone for some truly social enterprise?