“Nobody talks of entrepreneurship as survival, but that’s exactly what it is and what nurtures creative thinking.” – Anita Roddick
Archives for October 2008
The Fallacy of Social Enterprise?
Conviviality Counts!
The very best community based enterprise centres are usually described as convivial – friendly, agreeable and welcoming. That is convivial to the people whom the centre has been set up to serve – who need to feel relaxed and at home in the space.
My favourite local example of this is perhaps the Marjorie and Arnold Ziff Community Centre in Leeds. As you walk in you are faced with a (usually busy) community cafe – full of friendly local faces, from all generations, enjoying food, drink and conversation. The reception desk is a modest affair on your immediate right. This is a venue where the people that the centre serves are likely to feel at home, relaxed and welcomed. It has been designed that way.
This is in stark contrast to some enterprise centres that are certainly ‘impressive’ but are perhaps not always convivial. Automatic glass doors opening into impressive atriums followed by a walk to a large reception desk situated in front of a wall of frosted glass panels staffed by receptionists in business suits with blue tooth ear pieces and large monitors on their desk tops. Impressive – but not convivial. Not to many local people. As a friend of mine commented, ‘to some people the gap between the entrance and the reception desk might as well be a shark infested ocean…’
We know the importance of making enterprise clients feel relaxed and open so that they are comfortable to talk openly and honestly about their ideas – rather than feel that have to put on a show to ‘fit in’. Ernesto Sirolli tells the story of a woman who visited him in a university business centre. She was like a fish out of water, tongue tied, embarrassed and not at all at ease in her environment. When he arranged to visit her in her kitchen he met a woman transformed – relaxed, in control, articulate and confident in her own home. The description she gave of her enterprise idea was articulate, insightful and honest.
When I am training enterprise coaches I will get them to practice a new coaching skill in a relaxed and informal setting – a garden or patio for example. I will then ask them to use the same skills in a more formal business meeting room. The change in quality is palpable. They feel the difference.
Context matters, architecture matters, power symbols matter.
So when you are deciding where to meet your next enterprise client don’t just choose the most impressive local enterprise centre. Instead help them to choose a setting that they find convivial and welcoming. One that is likely to help you to do great work.
You might find that the ‘impressive enterprise centre’ is better kept for when you want them to practice being out of their comfort zone.
Sharing the Success Film
[Youtube=http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=5Hmx1vNTCNc]
This film is designed to provide information to partners about the Leeds LEGI programme – Sharing the Success.
It is not primarily aimed at client recruitment.
I would be interested to hear your thoughts….
Top Tip For Progressive Managers
“One of the things I do is I create an atmosphere where I am so direct and so open and collaborative with people I trust that it brings out the same in them”
Hank Paulson – US Treasury Secretary
The US Treasury may seem like a strange place to look for advice….but this does work!
Can anyone show me a business that is NOT ‘social’?
One that pays no-ones wages; that provides no-one with identity and respect?
That meets no customer needs?
That creates nothing that is valued by anyone?
One that does nothing socially useful with any of its profits?
It is nothing to do with legal structures, where profits go or being part of a ‘social enterprise movement’. It is part of being a human being and being enterprising. How many billions was it that Gates popped into the Gates foundation? Rowntree, Kauffman, Carnegie, Ziff, Ford, Getty, Mellon, Packard, Wellcome, Sage…
There is just ‘good’ business – ‘bad’ business and an awful lot of stuff somewhere in between.
Some businesses, and the social entrepreneurs behind them (can you show me an entrepreneur who is not ‘social’?) start out ‘bad’ unsustainable, polluting, exploitative etc and become ‘good’.
Some that start out ‘good’ get trapped in never ending battles for survival and become little more than ‘miserable grant writers’.
And there is a whole lot of subjectivity in making the distinctions between good business and bad business.
There are lots of us who have set up ‘for profit’ businesses as the simplest and easiest way to drive forward our social missions – which we hold just as passionately as our ‘social enterprise/not for profit distribution’ colleagues.
Once we start to recognise that ENTERPRISE is a tremendous driving force for innovation and change; good and bad; not only in the the economy but also in societal and global development, and stop pretending that only officially sanctioned, card carrying members of the ‘social enterprise movement’ have a monopoly on ‘good’ we might start to get some traction on developing enterprise as a tool for progress.