Just another WordPress site
In some very exciting conversations with Reach Further about bringing the Progressive Managers’ Network online.
Potentially become a blend of webinars, videos, face to face, e-mail and telephone support.
Looking forward to making this a reality over the summer.
Share this Post
While the physical features of spontaneous cities could be traced to complex histories of families, businesses, and organizations, the physical features of planned cities owe their origin only to the act of planning and speculation. This has severe consequences towards the sustainability of place as there will not grow any particular attachment by the residents, their presence there being only a temporary economic necessity and not the outcome of their life’s growth.
Share this Post
Community Anchors are independent, community-led organisations. They are at the heart of their communities, physically and psychologically. They are able to respond in a holistic way to local problems and challenges, by giving local people support to act.
Community Anchors come in many different shapes, forms and structures but they all share this basic purpose of animating and co-ordinating progress. You can read more about them here and here.
It seems that there is a high correlation between communities that experience successful regeneration and the development of effective Anchor Organisations.
This has led many regeneration funders to seek to establish Anchor Organisations in ‘failing’ communities in the belief that they can weave their magic and turn things around. And perhaps they can.
But I have a slight concern. I would hypothesise that Anchor Organisations emerge from communities that are already working actively at their own regeneration. They are a natural evolution as independent people and community organisations begin to reach out to each other in the realisation that only through association can they become more effective in their work.
Their success depends to a very large extent on the timing being right and incumbent diverse and fragmented community groups recognising that the development of a successful Anchor Organisation is in their best interest. This realisation and consensus can take many years to accrue.
If this hypothesis is correct then we should expect Anchor Organisations that have been artificially seeded by external funders to find it tough going. The local incumbents may not yet have reached the limits of their own development. They may not yet see the need for the anchor. They may see it as yet another project foisted on them by funders by more money with sense.
Instead of acting as midwifes to the birth of a wonderful new baby, regeneration professionals then end up putting a premature and often unwanted delivery into some very expensive intensive care – if the baby gets born at all.
I have had the privilege of working with some highly successful Anchor Organisations – which emerged from local people and groups in response to local circumstances and opportunities. I have also witnessed Anchor Organisations struggle to get off the ground – and most of these seem to have been primarily ‘funding’ and ‘policy’ driven, conceived by outsiders as an appropriate ‘strategic’ response to the needs of local communities.
If my hypothesis is right then Anchor Organisations are a naturally emergent property of communities that are already on the up. They are an effect of regeneration rather than a cause.
And instead of trying to seed them in communities where they perceive there is a need, funders should focus on facilitating local groups until such time as they decide that the time is right for an Anchor Organisation to emerge.
A leader is best when people barely know he exists,
when his work is done,
his aim fulfilled,
they will say: we did it ourselves.
Lao Tzu
Share this Post
We all have days, sometimes weeks, months even years when our enthusiasm and love for life is not as high as we want it to be. Don’t we?
We all suffer bouts of ‘passion depletion’.
In my world ‘passion’ is not just about enthusiasm, love and enjoyment. It is also a measure of suffering – as in ‘the passion of Christ’.
It is a measure of how much suffering we are prepared to put up with to pursue that which we love. It is linked to the question ‘Are you willing to pay the price for the success that you desire?’ What will you put up with, put at risk in order to pursue your dream? How many hours of practice, research, writing, planning and thinking?
In this formulation ‘passion depletion’ (now meaning a reduction in the amount of suffering you are prepared to put up with in order to pursue your goals) is a sign that you are falling out of love with your original goal. Perhaps there is something else that you would rather suffer for?
It maybe a very positive sign that ‘new doors’ are opening.
I know that this formulation about suffering is not popular, but for me it does reflect more of the truth of day to day life and professional and private practice. It provides me with a useful benchmark against which to gauge my life choices.
When some of your team seem to have ‘passion depletion’ it might be telling you, and them, something important.
Share this Post
I had an eventful afternoon yesterday. In order to vote I had to pop into electoral services in the Town Hall as my postal vote had failed to materialise. A polite, efficient, helpful and very professional service. Well done to the electoral services team at the council.
Vote registered I then visited a fantastic project in Hunslet called Involve led by Kris Clayden. Based in the old Salvation Army building – which is a bit of a 1970s concrete carbuncle – Kris and his team provide a service to young people from South Leeds who have been permanently excluded from school.
Delivered on a shoe string, through a cocktail of short term funding, working with some of the most challenging young people in Leeds, based in a building that is far from fit for purpose but doing an important job with passion and vigour. It took me back to my time of working with children in residential care. You learn a lot in these environments.
My next engagement was for the launch of the Leeds City Workshop. This is the product of a collaboration between Leeds City Council and one of the major property developers in the city to provide a physical space where planners can engage with communities and developers to discuss plans for the physical regeneration of the city.
The Leeds City Workshop occupies a part of the Wellington Street Marketing Centre where the city developers promote their latest residential, retail and industrial plans to well-heeled entrepreneurs and investors.
On arrival we were served with wine and lime and lemongrass cordial while a string quartet played Bach. The canapes reflected the tough times in the city – mini shepherds pies, chicken kebabs, crab cakes and and bruschetta. The patio was hardly sun drenched, but the re-assuring crunch of astroturf underfoot and the views across the city were sublime.
One of the proerty developers who had kindly provided the workshop space, in their Marketing Suite, (three enormous shipping containers sliced, diced and welded together) opened the speeches. He talked of tough times, but work on physical development of the city goes on. He told us how they work all over the country – but no-where else is doing city place shaping work quite as well as Leeds. Then a council official talking about the significant progress that has been made on the physical development of the city. How, where development projects are put on hold, they are working hard with developers to put interesting temporary projects in place – seeding lawns, marking out football pitches etc. How work on the arena will start soon and be completed in 2012. There si only one small problem – we ‘just’ need a planning permission. Luckily the head of planning permissions in the city was in the room – so I am sure that will not be a major problem.
All very impressive.
Then downstairs to see the actual workshop where the planning conversations are taking place. Without doubt they have created an impressive space. A square table for 22 people surrounded by high walls draped with impressive and colourful plans of the city. Acoustics professionally engineered and a state of the art audio visual system showing a film of the future Leeds with the city’s golden owl acting as winged guide from one planning triumph to the next.
This workshop is to be the base for John Thorp, the City Architect and his team to provide them with a more conducive environment for planning than the mundane facilities provided by the council. Leeds city planners co-located with and, in part, resourced by the developers – it reminded me of Our Friends in the North.
John seemed much taken by some ‘new’ technology that he heard about. Some kind of graphics tablets that meant he could draw images directly onto the audio visual system. No more climbing up ladders balancing felt tip pens and tippex! Try the Wacom Cintiq John I think you might love it.
The contrast between these two experiences was surreal. Kris in his 1970s carbuncle in Hunslet and John and the developers in their architect designed and styled acoustically engineered palace in the city with Bach and canapes.
One couldn’t help but feel that somewhere we had not quite the balance right between investing in local people and investing in physical infrastructure.
Share this Post